|
http://earnmoneyfast.org | |
| Enviado por amusedthomas1956 há 267 dias atrás | ||
|
As spotlighted, the natural gift economy is expected to experience the gift or gift giving something in return, as governmental support, military services, allegiance or other gifts and favors. This was popular in warrior orders where kings and generals given away freely to their foot soldiers waiting to shift their loyal service. In these organizations were social laws that penalized those who did not give anything in return. The punishment usually comprised of stop giving gifts to the jealous, but the penalty could also include a bad reputation, be released from the challenge to a duel or open ridicule.
Lewis Hyde names the spirit of the gift economy, as matched to a market economy, saying that what we should be passed to his time or something that is precious the same has to follow the way. The gift giver can be returned to the original, but this is not the most important. The only required thing is that the gift must always move.The stress that the traditional gift economy is based on the obligation to give, accept the obligation and the obligation to reciprocate, and this is both economic, legal, ethical, artistic, religious and dreamed. It's easy to fantasize about the thought of the gift economy, people do not always like entangled in a web of duties. Marcel Mauss wrote: "The gift not cut back to one who accepts it," . In a even giving economic system is frequently the example that the exchange of talents takes position between more than than two people. A tale of two adult females said that Kashmir Brahman sought to fulfill their obligations of charity giving gifts to each other. When they died, became poisoned two sources from which no one could drink, speculating the futility of this fraud of a present. This thought of extending the circle is seen in societies where hunters are beasts to the priests, the gift to the gods, which is supposed to return lush game. Hunters do not sacrifice them immediately. Ronald Coase argues that corporations are a form of production more efficient than the market. Yochai Benkler wrote an article entitled "Coase's Penguin, or Linux and the Nature of the Firm" which says there is a third mode of production called collaborative work. Charles Leadbeater speaks of the "revolution of professional amateurs" and "amateur professionals economy" in which fans motivated by economic reasons not grow in power and it supports a shared economy. Efforts such as the Creative Commons led by Lawrence Lessig encourages sharing and argues that both society and corporations benefit from this exchange. . |
||
|
|
||
Comentários